Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy A22, getting a score of 81.2 against 76.1. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is notably older than Galaxy A22, it's construction is just a little lighter and just a little thinner. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Galaxy A22 has Android 12.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a way better looking display than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a much better pixel number per inch of screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3120px resolution. LG V40 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.