Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ's global score of 81.2. Galaxy A50's body has the same thickness than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it is a little lighter. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher pixel count in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A50 has improved battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the LG V40 ThinQ, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.