Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. The LG V40 ThinQ is a just a bit lighter and just a little thinner phone than Galaxy A70, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user very similar OS features.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy A70 has better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. LG V40 ThinQ captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video quality, the LG V40 ThinQ also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a larger back camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V40 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.