Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is a bit thicker and heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy A71 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.