Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 score. The Galaxy F23 is a incredibly newer and lighter phone than the LG V40 ThinQ, but it's a bit thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has the newer 12 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features.
LG V40 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy F23, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 features a way better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.