Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 85.2 score against 81.2. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F41 has a more recent 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10. Even though Galaxy F41 is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ, it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch of screen. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy F41. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a camera with a way better resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 82 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.