Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting a general score of 88.1 against 81.2. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is incredibly newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's thicker and incredibly heavier.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more cores. The LG V40 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 112 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more MP back camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.