Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, having an 81.2 score against 76.7. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, although it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has Android 12 version.
LG V40 ThinQ has a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. The LG V40 ThinQ has a better display than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy M53 5G features a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller back camera sensor offering a way worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a lot higher 108 MP resolution camera. The LG V40 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has a superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.