Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's overall score of 81.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy S10 5G is an a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the LG V40 ThinQ.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bit greater screen pixel density. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V40 ThinQ and the Galaxy S10 5G feature very similar processing units, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S10 5G's camera is very similar to LG V40 ThinQ's camera, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same resolution camera, the same video frame rates and a F1.5 diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S10 5G has better battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.