Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, with an 86.3 score against 81.2. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10e and the LG V40 ThinQ were released only 5 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is somewhat lighter but a little bit thicker than the LG V40 ThinQ. Galaxy S10e and LG V40 ThinQ feature similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a just a bit greater display pixels density, a quite bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ and Galaxy S10e both have incredibly similar cameras, and although the Galaxy S10e has a larger sensor, they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Although Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S10e, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.