Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | -- |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.96 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra design is much thinner and noticeably lighter than LG V40 ThinQ. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a better looking screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a camera with a way better resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.