Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with an 81.2 score against 78.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V40 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11. LG V40 ThinQ is an notably older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but LG was able to make it somewhat thinner and a little lighter.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ features a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a bigger display.
LG V40 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture for better images in low light situations and a lot better video resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.