Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. LG V40 ThinQ is an incredibly older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner anyway.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a lot better performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The LG V40 ThinQ has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG V40 ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features slightly more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.