Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. LG V40 ThinQ's body is extremely thinner and way lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released about 16 months before.
The LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, more pixels per inch of screen and a quite larger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.