Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the LG V40 ThinQ, getting a overall score of 92.3 against 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and a bit thinner device than the LG V40 ThinQ, although it's also a little heavier. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing unit than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a camera that's just as good as LG V40 ThinQ's camera, because although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, a camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG V40 ThinQ has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G and LG V40 ThinQ have incredibly similar batteries.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V40 ThinQ, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.