Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a global score of 90.6, which is much better than the LG V40 ThinQ's score of 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is newer and somewhat thinner, but way heavier than the LG V40 ThinQ. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing power than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a way larger camera aperture. LG V40 ThinQ features more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with improved battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.