Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 version. The LG V40 ThinQ construction is a bit thinner and just a little lighter than vivo X70 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better number of pixels per display inch. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better processing power than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a greater memory for apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 Pro has longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.