Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than LG V40 ThinQ, with an 83.8 score against 81.2. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also a a little thicker and heavier cellphone. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a higher pixels density and a bit larger screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s count with extremely similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a higher amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a bit better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3% more battery size. The LG V40 ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with better video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.