Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 global score. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it's heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's CPU is just as good as LG V40 ThinQ's CPU, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The LG V40 ThinQ has much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 42 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.