Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a general score of 81.2 against 76.6. The LG V40 ThinQ body is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, despite of the fact that it was released around 19 months before. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should provide you all the same operating system features.
The LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V40 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 takes slightly better videos and photos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a way larger camera sensor and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.