Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 204.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting a global score of 81.2 against 81.1. These phones come with the same Android 10 operating system. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just 19 months before.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited situations and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
LG V40 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.