Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. The iPhone 8 construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than LG V50 ThinQ, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a lot larger display, a lot more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
The iPhone 8 counts with a little better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 8, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone 8, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger camera aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 120 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V50 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.