Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's general score of 80.3. The LG V50 ThinQ body is way newer, but just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a quite larger screen and a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality, a back-facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a worse video quality, it also counts with a way bigger aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.