Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Pixel 2, with an 83.7 score against 81.6. LG V50 ThinQ's design is newer than the Google Pixel 2's, but it is a lot heavier and a bit thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a larger display, a just a bit better screen pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a lower resolution camera, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V50 ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.