Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 global score. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is just a little heavier than the Google Pixel XL, it's a little bit thinner and incredibly newer. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger display, a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a just a little higher pixels density. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a worse video resolution, a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures and a worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.