Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is a bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's a lot thinner and extremely newer. These phones use Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.