Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. The LG V50 ThinQ design is notably newer and notably thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a bit better display density. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.