Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50, getting an 83.7 score against 81.2. LG V50 ThinQ's design is much older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Motorola Edge 50. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 features a little sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower pixels density and a little worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 counts with better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 features a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.