Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having a general score of 83.7 against 79.7. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older device than Moto G Stylus, but LG was able to build it a little bit thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixel density.
Moto G Stylus takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Stylus's battery duration is very similar to LG V50 ThinQ's battery performance.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.