Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora black | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Moto G60s, with an 83.7 score against 79.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Moto G60s has Android 11. The LG V50 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner and lighter cellphone than Moto G60s. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G60s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Moto G60s has longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G60s counts with just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.