Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is much heavier and way thicker. The LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a larger screen, a slightly better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a much larger aperture, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.