Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z4's global score of 79.8. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also a somewhat thicker and a bit heavier device. These phones come with the same Android 10 operating system.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Moto Z4, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher display density.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more megapixels back camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has an 11% more battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.