Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora black | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but both are 0.33inches thick. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little faster CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ and the OPPO Find X3 Pro both feature really similar displays, because although the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3216.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.