Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-10 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aurora black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, with an 84.7 score against 83.7. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer cellphone than LG V50 ThinQ, although it is heavier and just a little thicker.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A32 has just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A32 counts with longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.