Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A60, having an 83.7 score against 82.3. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A60 has Android 11. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be told that it is also a just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper display than Galaxy A60, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a higher pixels number per inch of screen and a bit larger display. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A60. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a lower video quality and a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.