Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, with a score of 91.8 against 83.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features and increased performance. The Galaxy A71 5G body is newer and a little thinner than the LG V50 ThinQ's, but it is also a little bit heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better display density. LG V50 ThinQ has a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.