Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy A80's design is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V50 ThinQ. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a slightly better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.