Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-10 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a somewhat heavier phone than LG V50 ThinQ, but both are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 OS.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A90 5G and LG V50 ThinQ feature really similar processing units, both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A90 5G features a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.