Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a score of 83.7 against 81. Although LG V50 ThinQ is thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro, it's a little bit lighter and also newer. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a higher pixel density and a little bit bigger screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy C9 Pro and LG V50 ThinQ count with extremely similar batteries duration. LG V50 ThinQ shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.