Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-05-10 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, with a global score of 83.7 against 76.1. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max's, although it is a bit thicker and a bit heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a little bigger screen. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.