Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. The Galaxy M31s design is newer, but thicker and a little heavier than LG V50 ThinQ. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy M31s has 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31s. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy M31s has a very superior battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy M31s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.