Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-10 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy S23 Ultra's global score of 81.5. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S23 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much better 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has greater battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.