Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, having an 83.7 score against 79.3. LG V50 ThinQ's body is a lot newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. LG V50 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
LG V50 ThinQ has superior battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.