Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 243.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though LG V50 ThinQ is noticeably older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. These phones include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a larger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.