Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 243.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 global score. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the LG V50 ThinQ were only released 8 months apart, Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is a little lighter but also just a little bit thicker. LG V50 ThinQ and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 have really similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better amount of pixels per display inch. LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 count with quite similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V50 ThinQ and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 feature incredibly similar batteries.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.