Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a general score of 87.6 against 77. LG V60 ThinQ's body is extremely newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than the HTC U Ultra. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and 4 more processing cores.
The HTC U Ultra has a slightly better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch in the display and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way bigger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a way better video quality.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V60 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.