Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a global score of 87.1, which is a bit better than iPhone XR's 82 overall score. The LG Velvet construction is newer, a little thinner and a little lighter than iPhone XR. The Apple iPhone XR has a little better performance than LG Velvet, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR has a little sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a just a little inferior pixels quantity per display inch, a quite smaller screen and a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution. The LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The LG Velvet features a much better battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 2942mAh. The LG Velvet captures better pictures and videos than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.