Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-05-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. The LG Velvet construction is notably newer and a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, although it is notably heavier. LG Velvet counts with a bit superior processor than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display. The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG Velvet also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
LG Velvet has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 55 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, LG Velvet is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.