Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Obsidian and Porcelain |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 2700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 4.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 overall score. The LG Velvet features a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG Velvet features a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller display.
The LG Velvet takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a 48 mega pixels camera in the back. LG Velvet has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features just a bit better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4650mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.