Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4, having a global score of 87.1 against 81.9. The LG Velvet construction is a little thinner but heavier than Google Pixel 4, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG Velvet. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG Velvet has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The LG Velvet shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.